Hi George,
Thank you.

Now, I understand it. Listing is more complex than expected as we will need to honour the media status too.

I am looking at some approaches(we can limit to logged in/public) and will get back to you with the correct.

The two approaches I am considering is

1. using pre_get_posts but specify tax arguments to force the status
2. Or using MPP_Media_Query

I am not sure which approach should we go as the first won’t need modification of template but second will be more intuitive(needs theme template modification though).

Hi Ken,
We are using google doc viewer for it.

If the update is not showing the preview, I will suggest disabling the doc viewer and making the doc files just attachment.

You can do that by following this
https://buddydev.com/mediapress/tips/how-disable-google-doc-viewer-mediapress/

Regards
Brajesh

Hi Richard,
There are multiple ways to achieve it.

We can use css media query for the same.

For example, here is how we use the old css to target viewport with min-width:980px

@media screen and (min-width: 980px) {
    .mpp-lightbox-content {
        width: 90%;
        display: flex;
        height: auto;
        min-height: 400px;

    }

    .mpp-lightbox-media-container {
        flex: 1;
        width: auto;
    }
}

You can customize it as you please.

Hope that helps.

Regards
Brajesh

Hi George,
I am sorry I had left early yesterday and was not able to assist.

There are a few things I will need to know:-
1. How are you enforcing the privacy?
2. What is the name of the taxonomy that you are using.
3. Are you using the same taxonomy for attachment and other post types too?

Please let me know and I will assist.

Thank you
Brajesh

Hi CapCa,
Welcome to BuddyDev.

In your case, member types seems to be a much better option. Use member types to create mutually exclusive groups of users and then you can use xprofile_query to easily display the list of users from the complementry type based on the current user’s member type.

Your approach for creating a normal profile field with the options will work too but won’t be as efficient as using member type in this case.

Bets Regards
Brajesh